July252014

i-want-cheese:

I sure get annoyed at other people a lot despite the fact that I’m the most annoying person I know.

(via keeper-of-the-cheese)

10AM

g-houst:

im-just-a-lie:

busket:

Ghost Girl (by Kevin Francis Gray)

Via

man but this photoset ignores some of my favorite things about this piece

like this

and this

it gives it more of a story i think

Every time I see this I must reblog!!

Not something I would usually reblog, but it’s so beautiful.

(Source: from89, via pwnofarc)

9AM

lepidoptera-and-insulin:

darthxmaulxlives:

pleatedjeans:

'Friday the 13th' Themed Engagement Photos

more pics here.

This is the cutest thing I’ve ever seen!!

THE BEST ENGAGEMENT PHOTOS

8AM

(Source: rumineely, via drippingana)

7AM
poppypicklesticks:

HOW DARE STEPHEN FRY ENJOY THE WEATHER WHEN HE’S NOT PERSONALLY FIXING UP THE PALESTINE ISSUE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HE HAD ONE JOB!!!!!!!!!!!!

poppypicklesticks:

HOW DARE STEPHEN FRY ENJOY THE WEATHER WHEN HE’S NOT PERSONALLY FIXING UP THE PALESTINE ISSUE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HE HAD ONE JOB!!!!!!!!!!!!

6AM
“You will either step forward into growth, or you will step back into safety.” Abraham Maslow (via nathanielstuart)

(via drippingana)

5AM
imminentdeathsyndrome:

poppypicklesticks:

halftheskymovement:

In an article for Take Part, writers Holly Eagleson and Lauren Wade retouched controversial advertisements by replacing women models with men. In doing so, Eagleson and Wade hoped to highlight the pervasiveness of sexual objectification of women. For example, they decided to remake American Apparel advertisements to draw attention to former CEO Dov Charney’s abuse and mistreatment of female employees, as well as to photographer Terry Richardson’s record of harassing and assaulting women.
“Charney and Richardson are really representative of a specific form of sexism and objectification in media today,” Wade told Huffington Post in an email. “Their collaborations, in particular for American Apparel, depict women in sexually vulnerable, pornographic positions where a lot of the model’s facial expressions look like they’ve been drugged or they’re drunk. These images are predatory. They depict women being taken advantage of and it’s supposed to look “sexy” and sell sweatshirts?”



*these images are predatory and objectify women*
Lol ok




But Wait!  I hear you cry!  
Those are all adverts for mens underwear!  That doesn’t count! Ok, let’s have a look for some of American Apparel’s non-underwear adverts! 


hmmm…. the shorts were the last thing I noticed here

American Apparel Socks used in a photoshoot
Feel free to check out the rest here, if you wanna see this adorable hunkster’s pubes
http://models.com/mdx/tag/francisco-lachowski/
You are equating scantily clad female models as “objectification of women” yet failing to notice that most fashion industries treat male models the exact same way.
It is intellectually dishonest to equate the use of scantily clad models to rape and sexual assault.   How can you argue against “she was wearing a short skirt so she must have wanted it” yet create a link between rape and scantily clad female models in the fashion industry? 
What does that say about all the female designers and gay male fashion designers who use scantily clad models of both sexes, including the sexes they are attracted to in their shoots? 

I bet male models are paid less, too.

Goodness, would ya look at that. [source]

imminentdeathsyndrome:

poppypicklesticks:

halftheskymovement:

In an article for Take Part, writers Holly Eagleson and Lauren Wade retouched controversial advertisements by replacing women models with men. In doing so, Eagleson and Wade hoped to highlight the pervasiveness of sexual objectification of women. For example, they decided to remake American Apparel advertisements to draw attention to former CEO Dov Charney’s abuse and mistreatment of female employees, as well as to photographer Terry Richardson’s record of harassing and assaulting women.

Charney and Richardson are really representative of a specific form of sexism and objectification in media today,” Wade told Huffington Post in an email. “Their collaborations, in particular for American Apparel, depict women in sexually vulnerable, pornographic positions where a lot of the model’s facial expressions look like they’ve been drugged or they’re drunk. These images are predatory. They depict women being taken advantage of and it’s supposed to look “sexy” and sell sweatshirts?”

*these images are predatory and objectify women*

Lol ok

But Wait!  I hear you cry!  

Those are all adverts for mens underwear!  That doesn’t count! Ok, let’s have a look for some of American Apparel’s non-underwear adverts! 

hmmm…. the shorts were the last thing I noticed here

American Apparel Socks used in a photoshoot

Feel free to check out the rest here, if you wanna see this adorable hunkster’s pubes

http://models.com/mdx/tag/francisco-lachowski/

You are equating scantily clad female models as “objectification of women” yet failing to notice that most fashion industries treat male models the exact same way.

It is intellectually dishonest to equate the use of scantily clad models to rape and sexual assault.   How can you argue against “she was wearing a short skirt so she must have wanted it” yet create a link between rape and scantily clad female models in the fashion industry? 

What does that say about all the female designers and gay male fashion designers who use scantily clad models of both sexes, including the sexes they are attracted to in their shoots? 

I bet male models are paid less, too.

Goodness, would ya look at that. [source]

(via radioactive-bunny-of-death)

4AM
endgaem:

brucewayneatl:

checawhatfrannywho:

thenakedeyes:

nezua:

guesswhoitsnadia:

siddharthasmama:

wr-th:

This is what Mozart actually looks like. The image was found in a radio station in Belgium. Fact - the Moors (Black people) brought Classical Music to Europe.
You’re welcome.

Not only that but when you read the REAL bios of him, he’s described as having brown skin, “negroid features” (broad, wide nose, etc) and wiry hair. There was a post going around back in February that was very enlightening.

Wasn’t Beethoven part Moor (Black) too? There was a book written about his hair because Europeans were so transfixed with it!

Yes, Beethoven was Black. 
Real history returns.

Peep this shit though <——— click that.

GET THE FCK OUTTA HERE. Naw cuhhhh. Nawwww. But…..but…..those names are so….Germanic. Sigh.

Whaaaaaaaaaat

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang_Amadeus_Mozart

Mozart’s physical appearance was described by tenor Michael Kelly, in his Reminiscences: “a remarkably small man, very thin and pale, with a profusion of fine, fair hair of which he was rather vain”. As his early biographer Niemetschek wrote, “there was nothing special about [his] physique. […] He was small and his countenance, except for his large intense eyes, gave no signs of his genius.” His facial complexion was pitted, a reminder of his childhood case of smallpox. There is a photofit of Mozart, created from four contemporary portraits.[83]

Even his childhood portrait, painted in 1763 on commission from Mozart’s father, depicts him as white:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3f/Wolfgang-amadeus-mozart_2.jpg
This didn’t even take five minutes of searching. You people are so fucking full of shit it would be hilarious if it wasn’t so goddamned pathetic.
This shit has over 17,000 notes, too. There really is no hope for tumblr. Misinformation here spreads faster than a California wildfire in a gasoline-soaked forest.

endgaem:

brucewayneatl:

checawhatfrannywho:

thenakedeyes:

nezua:

guesswhoitsnadia:

siddharthasmama:

wr-th:

This is what Mozart actually looks like. The image was found in a radio station in Belgium. Fact - the Moors (Black people) brought Classical Music to Europe.

You’re welcome.

Not only that but when you read the REAL bios of him, he’s described as having brown skin, “negroid features” (broad, wide nose, etc) and wiry hair. There was a post going around back in February that was very enlightening.

Wasn’t Beethoven part Moor (Black) too? There was a book written about his hair because Europeans were so transfixed with it!

Yes, Beethoven was Black. 

Real history returns.

Peep this shit though <——— click that.

GET THE FCK OUTTA HERE. Naw cuhhhh. Nawwww. But…..but…..those names are so….Germanic. Sigh.

Whaaaaaaaaaat

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang_Amadeus_Mozart
Mozart’s physical appearance was described by tenor Michael Kelly, in his Reminiscences: “a remarkably small man, very thin and pale, with a profusion of fine, fair hair of which he was rather vain”. As his early biographer Niemetschek wrote, “there was nothing special about [his] physique. […] He was small and his countenance, except for his large intense eyes, gave no signs of his genius.” His facial complexion was pitted, a reminder of his childhood case of smallpox. There is a photofit of Mozart, created from four contemporary portraits.[83]

Even his childhood portrait, painted in 1763 on commission from Mozart’s father, depicts him as white:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3f/Wolfgang-amadeus-mozart_2.jpg

This didn’t even take five minutes of searching. You people are so fucking full of shit it would be hilarious if it wasn’t so goddamned pathetic.

This shit has over 17,000 notes, too. There really is no hope for tumblr. Misinformation here spreads faster than a California wildfire in a gasoline-soaked forest.

(via radioactive-bunny-of-death)

3AM

bagelarms:

a lot of ppl seem confused on what cultural appropriation is so lemme break it down

IT IS NOT: enjoying food from another culture, enjoying music from another culture, learning about another culture, or learning another language

IT IS: using another culture as a costume, wearing religious articles as accessories when you are not a follower of that religion, using a race as a mascot, disrespecting religious or cultural practices. 

(via lepidoptera-and-insulin)

2AM

whenever i try and learn something new

  • me: It seems that I am not immediately excellent at this
  • me:
  • me:
  • me:
  • me:
  • me: it is because I am a failure
  • me: everything I touch dies
← Older entries Page 1 of 121